Kamis, 25 Maret 2010

[daarut-tauhiid] OOT - A Little Known Fact About the 9/11 Planes

*A Little Known Fact About the 9/11 Planes*
Friday, 19 March 2010 at 19:51

*By Anthony Lawson<http://www.facebook.com/note_redirect.php?note_id=105836152778400&h=8b8cc4bbcf72884243f2a01ebbd74968&url=http%3A%2F%2Fsabbah.biz%2Fmt%2Farchives%2Fauthor%2Fanthony-lawson%2F>*
| Sabbah Report<

*Extract:* *…it would be a remarkable irony, and quite possibly a unique
circumstance in the annals of American jurisprudence, if the assumptions
used as reasons for launching wars against two sovereign nations, as well as
the more generalised 'War on Terror' would not stand up as evidence in
either a criminal prosecution or a civil damages suit in an American court
of law.*

It is not a theory but a fact-one that is well known within the 9/11 truth
movement-that the 9/11 Commission failed to ensure that at least one of the
appropriate government agencies: the NTSB, the FBI or the FAA was
commissioned to positively identify the aircraft which were allegedly
involved in the murders of nearly 3,000 people, on September 11, 2001.


One does not need to be a Harvard Law School graduate to know that the first
and most important requirement in any murder investigation is to determine
the cause of death, which often leads to a requirement to identify, and
trace to its origins, a murder weapon, or, in the case of 9/11: weapons. And
there can be no doubt that each of the four planes which were allegedly
hijacked on the morning 9/11 was posited as being a murder weapon, by the
U.S. administration and the 9/11 Commission, yet there is absolutely nothing
which firmly connects the four allegedly-hijacked planes to any of the 9/11
crash sites.

In fact it is not fanciful to suggest that if a lawyer, even of a far lower
calibre than that of an Alan Dershowitz, were engaged to defend the airport
security companies that allegedly allowed 19 box-cutter-carrying Arabs to
get onto those planes, he would immediately call for the dismissal of such
an action on the grounds that the planes which allegedly hit the Twin Towers
of the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the one which crashed near
Shanksville had never been forensically identified as the planes which,
allegedly, had been hijacked that morning.

And such a motion could not possibly be denied, as I will explain.

The planes in question were alleged to have been: American Airlines flight
11 (Tail Number: N334AA), North Tower; United Airlines flight 175 (N612UA),
South Tower; American Airlines flight 77 (N644AA), the Pentagon, and United
Airlines flight 93 (N591UA), which supposedly crashed near Shanksville,
Pennsylvania. But the truth is that they could well have been different
planes that had arrived on the scenes from quite different locations,
because the crash debris recovered from those four crash sites has never
been forensically linked to the planes that allegedly took off from Logan
International, Boston; Dulles International, Washington and Newark
International, New Jersey, and which were, allegedly, hijacked shortly
thereafter. Therefore they cannot possibly be linked, without a reasonable
doubt, to breaches of security at those airports.

So, it would be a remarkable irony, and quite possibly a unique circumstance
in the annals of American jurisprudence, if the assumptions used as reasons
for launching wars against two sovereign nations, as well as the more
generalised 'War on Terror' would not stand up as evidence in either a
criminal prosecution or a civil damages suit in an American court of law.

Air-crash investigations in the United States are normally carried out by
the NTSB's air accident investigation division, and there are several
documentary television series featuring this government agency's painstaking
approach when investigating the causes of air crashes. During many such
investigations, serial numbers from recovered parts are cross checked with
the airline-in-question's purchase and maintenance records, to try and
identify the reason for an accident, when it is suspected that mechanical
failure may have been the cause.

However the NTSB has confirmed that-apparently for the first time from its
inception, in 1967, since when it has investigated more than 124,000 other
aviation accidents-it took no part in investigating any of the air crashes
which occurred on September 11, 2001. So the world has been asked to take it
on faith and hearsay that the four planes involved were normal scheduled
flights which were hijacked by Arab terrorists, some of whom, are,
allegedly, still alive.

Even more disturbing is the fact that documentation exists, and is available
on the Internet, which indicates that the FBI, backed up by a separate
letter from the Justice Department has refused to release any information,
under the Freedom of Information Act, about any debris recovered from the
crash sites, including the serial number of the "Black Box" Cockpit Flight
Data Recorder allegedly found near the alleged crash site of United Airlines
Flight 93. It may be recalled that a transcript taken from this recorder
formed the basis for several TV dramas and one Academy-Award winning feature
film.

By no means finally, but just as disturbing, the core of a jet engine, which
can been seen in several 9/11 videos falling out of the northern face of the
WTC's South Tower, and which hit a building on its way down, and was
photographed and videoed-in the presence of FBI personnel and at least one
FBI vehicle-where it came to rest at the junction of Church and Murray
streets, was later photographed, prior to its burial in a land fill on
Staten Island. So much for what murder investigators are usually so
concerned about: The chain of custody and preservation of important
evidence, pending its identification.

The events of 9/11 had consequences far beyond the destruction of life and
property in the United States; they were the reasons for the launching of
three wars. Yet it is obvious that a leader writer of an influential
newspaper, the *Washington Post*, could not spare the time to look into such
a serious matter-one that people with far fewer resources than he or she has
access to have managed to do-before launching a scathing attack on a member
of the Japanese parliament and the world-wide 9/11 truth movement, in
general.

Just because the 9/11 Commission did not do its job properly is no excuse
for newspaper writers not to do theirs. Unless, of course, newspapers such
as the *New York Times*, the *Wall Street Journal*, the *Washington
Post*and the
*Los Angeles Times* are playing a conscious role in a conspiracy to prevent
the truth about these events from surfacing. In which case their editors and
owners would almost certainly be guilty of misprision of felony.

I would like to stress that the identity of the planes is not the only
reason why the 9/11 Commission's findings should be regarded as invalid, and
its members found guilty, at the very least, of gross oversights in the
collection of the evidence which was used in the writing of its Final
Report. Even a cursory look at the visual evidence of the collapsing World
Trade Center's Twin Towers and WTC 7 should have instilled grave doubts
about the findings of some of the experts from the National Institute of
Standards and Technology, NIST.

But, for my money, the real smoking guns were, and still are, the four
aircraft that were used as weapons on that terrible day, and for them not to
have been identified breaks every rule in any book which seeks to teach the
art of solving crimes.

** Anthony Lawson (known professionally as Tony Lawson) is a retired
international-prize-winning commercials director, cameraman, ad agency
creative director and voice over. He used to be known for shooting humorous
commercials, but doesn't find much to laugh about, with the way the world is
going, these days.*

From the author:

*WTC7 — This is an Orange*

Video link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk<http://www.facebook.com/note_redirect.php?note_id=105836152778400&h=3a0e9a3f01ec971ebb2440edb1a509a6&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DZv7BImVvEyk>

A Little Known Fact About the 9/11
Planes<http://www.facebook.com/note_redirect.php?note_id=105836152778400&h=71de1f39cfa3d0ad2dfecaa0ca38c13c&url=http%3A%2F%2Fsabbah.biz%2Fmt%2Farchives%2F2010%2F03%2F19%2Fa-little-known-fact-about-the-911-planes%2F>is
a post from: Sabbah
Report<http://www.facebook.com/note_redirect.php?note_id=105836152778400&h=91aa8bf450786b39809c0c5815fff076&url=http%3A%2F%2Fsabbah.biz%2Fmt>.
Get Daily Newsletter<http://www.facebook.com/note_redirect.php?note_id=105836152778400&h=50070133e78b99b8c62fb2cea0eaa305&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeedburner.google.com%2Ffb%2Fa%2Fmailverify%3Furi%3DSabbahsBlog%26loc%3Den_US>,
follow on Twitter<http://www.facebook.com/note_redirect.php?note_id=105836152778400&h=eb2c3610b7738018da7900f39aee5788&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fsabbah>and
become a fan on
Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/note_redirect.php?note_id=105836152778400&h=92134989f80ad08f9e73020d88b5dc1c&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fpages%2FSabbah%2F6623242427>
.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

====================================================
Pesantren Daarut Tauhiid - Bandung - Jakarta - Batam
====================================================
Menuju Ahli Dzikir, Ahli Fikir, dan Ahli Ikhtiar
====================================================
website: http://dtjakarta.or.id/
====================================================Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/daarut-tauhiid/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/daarut-tauhiid/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
daarut-tauhiid-digest@yahoogroups.com
daarut-tauhiid-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
daarut-tauhiid-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

1 komentar:

Anonim mengatakan...

I hearby claim this section mine....